Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7458 (RAJ)

MUKESH KUMAR SAINI S/O JAWAHARMAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2390/2025 · 2025-05-05

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18830] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2390/2025 Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Jawaharmal Saini, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Borawali Dhani Udaipurwati, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2484/2025 Prabhakar Saini S/o Makkhanlal Saini, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhani Chauhanji Wala, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail Neemkathana). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat Mr. Vikram Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 05/05/2025 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.539/2024 registered at Police Station Neemkathana Sadar for offence under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S Act. 2. Since both these cases arise out of common order, hence they are being decided by this single order. [2025:RJ-JP:18830] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2390/2025] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged contraband recovered is below the commercial quantity. There are no previous cases registered against the petitioners. The petitioners are behind the bars since 14.1.2024. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Mukesh Kumar Saini and Prabhakar Saini be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J BMG/51-52