Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7458 (AP)

KOLLIPARA VENKATA BRAHMA RAO v. MOVVA VENKATESWARA RAO

CRP/542/2025 · 2025-07-17

Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010075752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. KOLLIPARA VENKATA BRAHMA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. TIPPANAGUNTA VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. MOVVA VENKATESWARA RAO, , S/o. Dharma Rao, Aged about 77 years, R/o. Tippanagunta Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna Distric Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow t Order dated 20-01-2025 in I.A No. 249 of 2023 in A.S No. 16 of 2017, on the file of the court of The Court Of The XV Addl. District Judge Nuzvid, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings in A.S No. 16 of 2017, on the file of the court of The Court Of The XV Addl. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 542/2025 KOLLIPARA VENKATA BRAHMA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. TIPPANAGUNTA VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND MOVVA VENKATESWARA RAO, , S/o. Dharma Rao, Aged about 77 R/o. Tippanagunta Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna Distric ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the 2025 in I.A No. 249 of 2023 in A.S No. 16 of 2017, on the file of the court of The Court Of The XV Addl. District Judge Nuzvid, Krishna ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings in A.S No. 16 of 2017, on the file of the court of The Court Of The XV Addl. District Judge Nuzvid, Krishna District Counsel for the Petitioner: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3299] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI KOLLIPARA VENKATA BRAHMA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. TIPPANAGUNTA VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER MOVVA VENKATESWARA RAO, , S/o. Dharma Rao, Aged about 77 R/o. Tippanagunta Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna Distric ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be he Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the 2025 in I.A No. 249 of 2023 in A.S No. 16 of 2017, on the file of the court of The Court Of The XV Addl. District Judge Nuzvid, Krishna ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings in A.S No. 16 of 2017, on the file of District Judge Nuzvid, Krishna District 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 542/2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Marri Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner in the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.139 of 2009 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Nuzvid. The said suit was dismissed and challenging the same, A.S.No.16 of 2017 was filed by the plaintiff which is pending in the Court of XV Additional District Judge, Nuzvid. In the said appeal, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.249 of 2023 under Order 41 Rule 27 and Section 151 of CPC., seeking permission to file certain documents as mentioned in the list. The present petitioner filed objection. Learned Court however had allowed the application inter-alia observing that it was satisfied for the reasons recorded in the application supported in the affidavit i.e., I.A.No.249 of 2023. 3. Challenging the said order, the present CRP has been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage there was no jurisdiction for the Court to pass the order in the application filed under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. He submits that such application is required to be considered at the time of consideration of the appeal on merits. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly concedes the legal position and submits that appropriate direction to the learned Trial Court may be given and the Civil Revision Petition may be disposed of. 6. Considering the aforesaid submissions, as also that the law is well settled that the application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC in appeal requires to be considered at the time of hearing of the appeal, this Court is of the view that any such order in the application was not required to be passed, at this stage. 7. This petition is, therefore, allowed setting aside the impugned order but with direction to the learned Appellate Court to consider and decide I.A.No.249 of 2023 afresh, at the appropriate stage, without being influenced by any observation made in the impugned order. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J Dated: 18.07.2025 AG 269 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 542/2025 Dated: 18.07.2025 AG