V MUNIRAJU v. BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION
RP/552/2024 · 2025-11-26
Jyoti M
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48914 RP No. 552 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REVIEW PETITION NO. 552 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
V.MUNIRAJU, S/O. LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/3, KUVEMPU ROAD, SSVS SCHOOL, KBSK, 2ND STAGE, KADIRENAHALLI NEW COLONY BENGALURU - 560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.C.BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.
BY ITS CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER
2.
THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, BENGALURU DIVISION II, KARMIKA BHAVANA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 026.
3.
THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT SUB DIVISION II, KARMIKA BHAVANA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 026. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48914 RP No. 552 of 2024
THIS REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 47, RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 READ WITH RULE 39 OF THE WRIT PROCEEDINGS 1977, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.M.C.Basavaraju., counsel for the review petitioner, has appeared in person. The review petition is listed today for orders regarding maintainability. It is heard finally. The review petition is filed seeking a review of the order dated October 13, 2023, passed in W.P. No.938/2022. Counsel for the review petitioner urged several
contentions. Heard and perused the papers with care. Suffice it to note that the review petitioner was respondent No.3 and the Corporation was the petitioner in the writ petition. The writ petition was listed on 13.10.2023. Counsel for the corporation and respondent No.3 had filed a joint memorandum of settlement, and the petition was
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48914 RP No. 552 of 2024
disposed of in terms of the joint memorandum of settlement. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, the review petition is liable to be dismissed. Resultantly, the review petition is dismissed.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18