Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74544 (PNJ)

PARAMJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/43789/2025 · 2025-08-12

Subhas Mehla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-43789-2025 1 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43789-2025 Date of decision: 12.08.2025 PARAMJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravinder Singh, Deputy A.G., Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA , J (Oral): 1. Petitioners have filed present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for issuance of directions to the official respondents to ensure that the petitioners are not harassed by respondent No.4 and to decide their representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners are parents of Gagandeep Singh who has dispute with respondent No.4- Sunil Kumar. Sunil Kumar along with some other persons is harassing the son of the petitioners. The petitioners have moved an application against those persons to the respondent No.2 and respondent No.3 but no action has been taken against them. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submitted that on representation of the petitioners, the authority will take action as per law. MONIKA RANI 2025.08.19 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-43789-2025 2 5. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation submitted on behalf of the petitioners in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 12.08.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.08.19 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document