2025:UHC:7207 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/297/2022 Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2. 4. This revision was filed by the revisionist- husband against respondent no.2-wife challenging the order dated 27.05.2022 passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in petition no.150 of 2021 “Smt. Nagma vs. Wazid”, under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., whereby application filed by the respondent no.2-wife seeking interim maintenance allowance was partly allowed for ₹ 5,000/- per month. 5. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that petition no.150 of 2021 has been finally decided by the Family Court, vide judgment and order dated 29.03.2025 and, as such, present criminal revision has become infructuous. Copy of judgment dated 29.03.2025 has been supplied by learned counsel for the revisionist to the Court. Same is taken on record. 6. In view of statement made by learned 2025:UHC:7207 counsel for the parties, criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) 14.08.2025 Rajni RAJINI GUSAIN Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48448a c3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d01342 , postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4DF 4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A158 A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.08.19 17:21:16 +05'30'