- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30025 WP No. 25414 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.25414 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: ZEENATH BEGUM @ ZEENATH UNNISA W/O TAJ PASHA, D/O GHAFFAR KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 3964, BHARAT SINGH ROAD, HADI MASJID ROAD, DEVASANDRA, K. R. PURAM, BANGALORE – 560 036 REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. IMRAN KHAN, S/O GHAFFAR KHAN. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE – 560 009 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, BANGALORE – 560 009 3. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009 Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30025 WP No. 25414 of 2023 4. SRI MIR JAFAR ALI KHAN S/O LATE MIR MANSOOR ALI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO 48/1A, J. K. FARM, DUBASAPALYA MAIN ROAD, VIJAYALAKSHMI APARTMENT VTC BAGALORE – 560 059. 5. SRI SHAZAD ALI KHAN S/O LATE MIR MANSOOR ALI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO 48/1A, J. K. FARM, DUBASAPALYA MAIN ROAD, VIJAYALAKSHMI APARTMENT, R.V.C.E. POST BAGALORE – 560 059 6. SRI. MIR SALABAT ALI KHAN S/O LATE MIR MANSOOR ALI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO 48/1A, J. K. FARM, DUBASAPALYA MAIN ROAD, R.V.C.E. POST, BAGALORE – 560 059 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. N. GURUVA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R6 R5 SERVED – UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN R.P.NO.132/2023 DTD 31.10.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30025 WP No. 25414 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 18.06.2025 stating that parties have settled the dispute amicably and therefore the petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL