Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74499 (BOM)

LAXIMAN RAMCHANDRA LANDAGE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS

CA/10435/2025 · 2025-12-03

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 53 CA 10434 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10434 OF 2025 IN FAST/23823/2025 SHESHERAO DHONDIBA MALUSARE DIED THR LRS KEVALBAI SHESHERAO MALUSARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10439 OF 2025 IN FAST/23850/2025 TANAJI RAMDAS MALUSARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10438 OF 2025 IN FAST/23862/2025 MURLIDHAR GOVINDRAO PANCHAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10435 OF 2025 IN FAST/23865/2025 LAXIMAN RAMCHANDRA LANDAGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS 2025:BHC-AUG:33827 ( 2 ) 53 CA 10434 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10440 OF 2025 IN FAST/23859/2025 PRABHAKAR GOVINDRAO PANCHAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10437 OF 2025 IN FAST/23853/2025 VAMAN GOVINDRAO PANCHAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10436 OF 2025 IN FAST/23856/2025 PARSHURAM SHESHERAO MALUSARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS … Mr. H. B. Nandagavale, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 03.12.2025 PER COURT :- ( 3 ) 53 CA 10434 OF 2025 . Heard. 2. Applicants seek to condone the delay of 3106 days in preferring the appeals. The contesting respondent no.3 has not caused appearance. Learned AGP opposing the applications. 3. The averments of the applications have not been traversed. There is no reason to doubt the bonafides of the applicants. It is desirable to condone the delay on certain conditions. 4. Civil Applications are allowed. The delay stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the period of 3106 days. FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NO.) . Admit. The learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent nos.1 and 2/State. 2. Call for Record and Proceeding. Print is dispensed with. 3. Appellants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) PRW