Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7449 (CHH)

Hetram Patel v. Dilip Gendare

MAC/37/2018 · 2025-08-18

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:41879 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 37 of 2018 1 - Hetram Patel S/o Lalaram Patel, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Amsena, P.S. Aarang, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Naagesh Kumar Patel Aged About 7 Years Through Legal Guardian S/o Hetram Patel, R/o Village Amsena, P.S. Aarang, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ...............Claimants, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Dilip Gendare S/o Amritlal Gendare, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Bhejradih, P.S. Kharora, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..............Non-Applicant No.1, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ajay Kumar Gendare S/o Amritlal Gendare, Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Bhejradih, P.S. Kharora, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Vehicle Bajaj Discover Registration No. C.G.22- 7587 .............Non-Applicant No.2, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Bhartiya A.X. General Insurance Company Limited, Through Managing Director, Chawla Complex, First Floor, Devendra Nagar, Road Raipur, Chhattisgarh Insurer Of Bajaj Discover Registration No. C.G.22-7587 R/o Village Bhejradih P.S. Kharora, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..............Non-Applicant No.3, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondent(s) No. 3 : Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 19/08/2025 1. Vide order dated 9.4.2025, the appellant was directed to pay cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the High Court Legal Service Committee but till date neither the amount has been paid nor the default has been removed as pointed out by the Registry. 2. As such, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the MAC for non compliance of order dated 9.4.2025. 3. Accordingly, the instant MAC is dismissed for non compliance of order dated 9.4.2025. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat