Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44668 RSA No. 391 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 391 OF 2019 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SMT VEENA S SWAMY W/O N B SIDDALINGA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NONAVINA KERE VILLAGE, TIPATURU TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SOMARJUNA V.M, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1.
N SREENIVASAN SINCE DEAD BY LR'S R1(a) MRS. GEETHA N W/O LATE N SRINIVASAN R1(b) ADARSH SRINIVASAN S/O LATE N SRINIVASAN R1(c) ASHOK SRINIVASAN S/O LATE N SRINIVASAN ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.109, MB03, KHB COLONY SURYANAGAR, PHASE 01 CHANDAPURA, ATTIBELE ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE.
(AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 12.07.2022) Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44668 RSA No. 391 of 2019
2.
C.N MANJEGOWDA THE PRESIDENT BHAVYA BHARATHI GRUHA NIRMANA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA NO.56, 3RDROAD, 2ND CROSS, LIC LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, SREERAMAPURA MYSURU-570 004
3.
THE COMMISSIONER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU-570 004 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOJANNA K.J, ADVOCATE FOR R1(a - c), R3 - SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.06.2017 PASSED IN RA.NO.80/2017 (OLD RA.NO.212/2016) ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.08.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44668 RSA No. 391 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT The appellant has remained absent since 27.01.2024. The matter was listed on 04.11.2025 and there was no representation for the parties even on the second call. Finally, the matter is listed today. Today also, there is no representation for the parties even on the second call. Though the matter is of the year 2019, it seems that the parties are not interested to pursue this Writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3