M/S A S PLYWOOD AND SAWMILL WOOD INDUSTRIES v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/30436/2025 · 2025-10-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74472 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74472 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42215 WP No. 30436 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 30436 OF 2025 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN:
M/S A S PLYWOOD AND SAWMILL WOOD INDUSTRIES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRESS, SMT. AKHILA KHANUM, W/O SYED SIRAZ, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, PLOT NO. 208 B1 B2, HN PURA ROAD, KIADB INDUSTRIES, HASSAN 573201 (NOT CLAIMING UNDER SENIOR CITIZEN) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N DINESH RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF FOREST ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003.
3.
THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN -573 201.
4.
CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, HASSAN CIRCLE HASSAN 573 201
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42215 WP No. 30436 of 2025
5.
RANGE FOREST OFFICER, HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN -573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING FOR DIRECTION OR ORDER INCLUDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO R-2 TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 02.08.2018 VIDE ANNX-D AND 29.06.2021 VIDE ANNX-G AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents.
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
1. Issue a writ, direction or order including Writ of mandamus to Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider the application of the petitioner dtd. 02.08.2018 vide Annexure-D and 29.06.2021 vide Annexure-G, and
2. Direct the respondents Nos.2 to 5 not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner unit including closure/seizure and,
3. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity."
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42215 WP No. 30436 of 2025
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application, which had been filed by the petitioner on 02.08.2018 at Annexure-D and 29.06.2021 at Annexure-G, have not been considered by the respondents.
4. Whenever any application is filed for grant of any permission, it is required for the respondents to consider the same and pass necessary orders either accepting or rejecting the same, within a reasonable period of time. Needless to say, if an order of rejection is passed, it should be accompanied by reasons. Neither having been done, I pass the following order:
ORDER a) Writ petition is allowed. b) Mandamus is issued to the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider the application of the petitioner at Annexures-D and G, within a
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42215 WP No. 30436 of 2025
period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. c) The petitioner is restrained from using any machinery, which has been installed, until such permission is obtained.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4