Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74457 (ALL)

MOHD. SABAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/22446/2025 · 2025-07-14

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114064-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22446 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Saban Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharda Prasad Mishra,Subhash Chandra Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Yash Padia Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents, and Shri Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for Kanpur Development Authority. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction commanding the respondents to decide the application dated 12.03.2024, moved by the petitioner for mutating his name in place of his father, late Mohd. Akhtar, who was the original allottee, as per the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development (Assessment, Levy and Collection of Development Fee) Rules 2022, within the stipulated period. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue involved, with the consent of parties herein, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation ventilating his grievances before the authority concerned within ten days, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months, thereafter, in accordance with the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development (Assessment, Levy and Collection of Development Fee) Rules 2022. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad