IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Dalbir Singh State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI Bench had request of a proxy counsel. However, no one is present on behalf petitioner in the revised call to pursue the matter. Therefore, this Court is choice-less, but to dismiss the petition for 06.07.202 Ak Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Dalbir Singh Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) On the last date of hearing, i.e. 03.12.2025, a Coordinate Bench had passed the hereinafter extracted order: “Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner stated that learned arguing counsel for the petitioner is busy before some other for an adjournment. Adjourned to 06.07.2026. It is made clear that if on the next date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear to argue the matter, the interim order shall be deemed to be vacated.” The matter was passed over in the first round, pursuant to a request of a proxy counsel. However, no one is present on behalf petitioner in the revised call to pursue the matter. Therefore, this Court is less, but to dismiss the petition for Ordered accordingly. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12353-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.07.2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. On the last date of hearing, i.e. 03.12.2025, a Coordinate passed the hereinafter extracted order:- “Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the that learned arguing counsel for the petitioner is busy before some other Bench and has prayed Adjourned to 06.07.2026. ade clear that if on the next date of hearing, counsel for the petitioner does not appear to argue order shall be deemed to be The matter was passed over in the first round, pursuant to a request of a proxy counsel. However, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner in the revised call to pursue the matter. Therefore, this Court is less, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No .2026 On the last date of hearing, i.e. 03.12.2025, a Coordinate “Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the that learned arguing counsel for the Bench and has prayed ade clear that if on the next date of hearing, counsel for the petitioner does not appear to argue order shall be deemed to be The matter was passed over in the first round, pursuant to a the petitioner in the revised call to pursue the matter. Therefore, this Court is AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.06 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document