Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7444 (PNJ)

RAMPHAL AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/2269/2020 · 2026-07-06

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ramphal and another State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present: JAGMOHAN BANSAL 1. Constitution of India are seeking compensation along with interest Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2. squarely covered by the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Court in CWP 11223-2023 (Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana and another). 3. said order. No.2269-2020 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision : Ramphal and another Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate, for Mr. R.K. Girdhwal, Advocate, for applicant-petitioners. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. ( Oral ) The petitioners through instant petition under Article Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to make payment of compensation along with interest @ 15% per annum as per Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present case is squarely covered by the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Court in CWP 2023 (Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana and another). Learned State counsel expressed his inability to cont said order. - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2269-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.07.2026 …….Petitioners ...….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Sandeep Yadav, Advocate, for Mr. R.K. Girdhwal, Advocate, Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of direction to respondents to make payment of 15% per annum as per Section 34 of the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present case is squarely covered by the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Court in CWP 2023 (Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana and another). Learned State counsel expressed his inability to controvert the -1- 227 of direction to respondents to make payment of 15% per annum as per Section 34 of the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present case is squarely covered by the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Court in CWP- rovert the AJAY PRASHER 2026.07.06 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.2269-2020 (O&M) -2- 4. In view of the aforesaid statement, present petition stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-11223-2023. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) July, 06, 2026 JUDGE Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2026.07.06 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document