- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42123 RFA No. 1514 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1514 OF 2016 (INJ) BETWEEN: N. RASHMI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, WIFE OF S. NAVEEN, RESIDING AT NO.1411, 2ND FLOOR, 26 MAIN A CROSS, SOUTHEND ROAD, NEAR RAGIGUDDA TEMPLE, BANGALORE-560 078. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S. KASHINATH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. R. SHANKARA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, SON OF H.S. RANGASWAMY, 2. SMT. H.S. VANI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, WIFE OF R. SHANKARA, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT #1307, 20TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, 2ND PHASE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078. 3. D.N. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF LATE D.NANJUNDASWAMY, Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42123 RFA No. 1514 of 2016 4. SMT. CHARUMATHI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WIFE OF D.N. NAGARAJU, BOTH RESIDING AT #128/7, "SREEKANTESHWARA KRUPA" REDDY LAYOUT, ADACENT TO PRAMOD LAYOUT, NAYANANDANA HALLI POST, BANGALORE-560039. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUNITHA M, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; V/O DATED 13.07.2023, APPEAL AGAINST R1 STANDS ABATED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.08.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.10121/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT This Court on 16.10.2025 passed the following order : “There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. List this matter under the caption of 'Dismissal' on 23.10.2025, failing to appear - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42123 RFA No. 1514 of 2016 on the said date, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution.” The matter is listed today under the caption ‘dismissal’. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is of the year 2016. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, this Court has no option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57