IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CRWP-7141-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.09.2025 Manmeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondent No. 4 in terms of his representation dated 27.06.2025. 2. Status report has been filed by the respondent-State, as per which, the aforesaid representation has never been received by either of the official respondents. It is also submitted that the petitioner is working in a factory at Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Learned State counsel has placed on record copy of the statement recorded by the sister of the petitioner to the effect that he is working at Lucknow and does not require any security. 3. The aforesaid fact has not been controverted by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the position explained above, no further orders are called for in the present petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. 19.09.2025 (MANISHA BATRA) Waseem Ansari JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.09.19 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document