ASHWANI ALIAS GOLU YADAV ALIAS NIKKI v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/24497/2025 · 2025-07-16
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74405 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74405 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115564 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24497 of 2025 Applicant :- Ashwani Alias Golu Yadav Alias Nikki Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Padmaker Pandey,Rakesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Padmaker Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.53 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 304B I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The son of the informant was present at the time of inquest proceedings which were complete on 29.01.2024 at 11:15 a.m. itself. The FIR has been instituted more than two days after the inquest proceedings as an afterthought and legal consultation. There is no explanation of the said delay caused.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that it is a clear-cut case of false implication. The cause of death was asphyxia as a result of ante-mortem hanging. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 04.03.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of FIR and the fact that the son of the informant was present at the time of inquest proceedings, and without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant- Ashwani Alias Golu Yadav Alias Nikki, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.
Order Date :- 17.7.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad