HARI NARAYAN CHATURVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9596/2025 · 2025-07-14
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74404 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74404 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115456 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9596 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hari Narayan Chaturvedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav,Ashutosh Kumar,Raj Kishore Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to pay the gratuity to the petitioner alongwith interest @ 6% per annum on such arrears who were denied gratuity at the time of superannuation in terms of the existing judgment and order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court within stipulated period.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has made representation before the respondent-authorities concerned, but no decision has been taken till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent -authorities to take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within a time bound period. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submits that the petitioner is not entitled for gratuity as per the settled position of law, however, in case a fresh representation is given before the respondent no.3, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3- District Basic Education Officer, Farrukhabad alongwith certified copy of this order, raising all his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order if there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 15.7.2025/Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad