1 2025:CGHC:6352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 389 of 2019 1 - Basant Banerjee S/o Late M.M. Banerjee Aged About 65 Years R/o Mohall Sattipara,ambikapur ,police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur ,district Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Distrct Collector ,sarguja Ambikapur Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Sourabh Filip S/o Late Vijay Filip Aged About 25 Years R/o Datta Colony Ambikapur Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Vivek Agrawal S/o Ramchandra Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Deviganj Road ,ambikapur ,police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur ,district Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Ritesh Agrawal S/o Ramchandra Agrawal Aged About 35 Years R/o Deviganj Road ,ambikapur ,police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur ,district Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Shiv Agrawal S/o Ramchandra Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o Deviganj Road ,ambikapur ,police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur ,district Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 6 - Hemant Agrawal S/o Ramchandra Agrawal Aged About 28 Years R/o Deviganj Road ,ambikapur ,police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur ,district Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Chinu Khan S/o Abdul Ajeet Khan Aged About 50 Years R/o Datta Colony ,ambikapur .Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur ,district Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondents : Shri G.L. Uike, Panel Lawyer, Shri D.N. Prajapati, Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Shri Divyanand Patel, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Rishikant Mahobiya, counsel for the respective respondents Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 04/02/2025 1. None present for the petitioner in two rounds. 2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the CRMP for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the CRMP is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Kamde NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.02.07 10:48:24 +0530