KARUNA VINOD NEMANIWAR v. PRABHAKAR KISHANRAO NEMANIWAR AND OTHERS
WP/14325/2023 · 2025-12-03
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74399 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74399 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 964 WP 14325-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 WRIT PETITION NO. 14325 OF 2023 KARUNA VINOD NEMANIWAR VERSUS PRABHAKAR KISHANRAO NEMANIWAR AND OTHERS … Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh – Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar – Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 5 …
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 03.12.2025 PER COURT :
1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2. The petitioner challenges the common order dated 31.01.2023 passed by the District Judge - 2, Nanded below Exhibits 5, 11 and 35 in Regular Civil Appeal No.94/2018, whereby the applications for temporary injunction were allowed and the present petitioner was restrained from alienating the suit land and from creating third party interest therein.
3.
Learned Counsel appearing for both sides submit that the appeal is pending since the year 2018. Therefore, without going into the merits of the matter, both the learned Counsel submit that if the appellate Court is
directed to decide the appeal within a stipulated period, the purpose 2025:BHC-AUG:34099
2 964 WP 14325-2023.odt would be served.
4. In view thereof, the District Judge, Nanded, is directed to decide the Regular Civil Appeal No.94/2018 within a period of six (6) months from today.
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
6. Pending civil applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/