Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74396 (KAR)

SRI. D.L NAGARAJ v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16167/2022 · 2025-12-09

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52442 WP No. 16167 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16167 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. D.L NAGARAJ S/O LATE PATEL LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT. UGANI VILLAGE, THIPPADODDI POST VIA NANGALLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563132 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFITS NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MRINAL KUTTAPPA, ADV. FOR SMT. LEELA.P, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND LEGISLATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE KARNATAKA STATE SEEDS CORPROATION LTD, A GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52442 WP No. 16167 of 2022 UNDERTAKING REGISTERED UNDER PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT-1956/2013 BEEJA BHAVAN, BELLARI ROAD, HEBBAL, BENGALURU - 560024. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.S.ASHWIN KUMAR, ADV. FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, QUASH THE IMPUGNED RESOLUTION DTD.17.11.2021 BEARING RESOLUTION NO.3/302-2021-22 PASSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE R-2 COMPANY A COPY OF WHICH IS HEREIN PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E IN FAR AS PETITIONS IS CONCERNED AS BEING ILLEGAL AND VOID AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52442 WP No. 16167 of 2022 ORAL ORDER The petitioner herein is assailing the Resolution dated 17.11.2021 (Annexure-E), issued by the Board of Directors of the 2nd respondent-Company. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents that the prayer sought for by the petitioner with respect to the Resolution passed by respondent No.2 is completed by efflux of time. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required to be made in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29