- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34873 RSA No. 14 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2014 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. VENKATAPPA S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS. 2. NARAYANAPPA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 3. DHAMODARA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 4. JALANDHARA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 5. VENKATESHA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS R/A HOCHIHALLI DASARAHATTI VILLAGE NAGARALU POST, SAKHARYANAPATNA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK - 577 548 CHIKKAMAGALUR DIST. …APPELLANTS (APPELLANTS - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. VENKAMMA W/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 2. RAMAPPA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34873 RSA No. 14 of 2014 3. THIMMAPPA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 4. MAHESHA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 5. RANGHANATH S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS AND RESIDENTS OF KARENAHALLI VILLAGE, MATHIGHATTA POST KASABA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK - 577 548 CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT. 6. T.V. VENKATAPPA @ YANKATAPPA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/AT JODI HOCHIHALLI DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, HOCHIHALLI DHAKALE NAGARALU POST, SAKHARAYAPATNA HOBLI KADUR TALUK - 577 548 CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR RODNAVAR, ADV. FOR C/R-6; R-1 TO R-3 SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 27.9.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.69/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., KADUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 1.9.2008 PASSED IN OS.NO.12/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., KADUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34873 RSA No. 14 of 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT 1. This case is listed under the caption 'dismissal' pursuant to the order dated 28.08.2025 wherein this Court permitted the counsel for the appellant to retire from brief. Thereafter, the Court directed the Registry to name all the appellants in the cause list. 2. Appellants' names are mentioned in the cause list. There is no representation. The appeal is of the year 2014. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8