NATIONAL URDU PRIMARY SCHOOL JINTUR THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER SAYYAD MAHEBOOB HASAN AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER THROUGH REGISTRAR
WP/6071/2022 · 2025-12-03
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74355 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74355 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 1015 WP 6071-2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1015 WRIT PETITION NO. 6071 OF 2022 NATIONAL URDU PRIMARY SCHOOL JINTUR THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER SAYYAD MAHEBOOB HASAN AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER THROUGH REGISTRAR AND ANOTHER … Mr. Ameya N. Sabnis a/w. Mr. Pranav Dhakne – Advocate for Petitioners Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent No.1, State Mr. Y.B. Pathan – Advocate for Respondent No.2 …
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 03.12.2025 PER COURT :
1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2. The petitioners challenge the order dated 18.05.2021 passed by the State Information Commissioner, Aurangabad Bench, Aurangabad, in Appeal No.9895/2019, whereby the appeal filed by respondent No.2 came to be allowed.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned
order dated 18.05.2021 was passed by respondent No.1 without hearing of the petitioners. He further submits that the notice dated 27.04.2021, fixing the date of hearing on 18.05.2021, was received to the petitioners on 21.05.2021. 2025:BHC-AUG:33908
2 1015 WP 6071-2022.odt
4. Even this position is not disputed by the learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1 and learned Counsel for respondent No.2.
5. In view thereof, the Writ Petition is allowed. The order dated 18.05.2021 passed by the State Information Commissioner, Aurangabad Bench, Aurangabad, in Appeal No.9895/2019 is quashed and set aside.
6. The matter is restored before the State Information Commission, Aurangabad. The parties shall appear before the State Information Commissioner, Aurangabad on 15.12.2025.
7. The State Information Commissioner, Aurangabad, shall decide the matter within three (3) months from the appearance of the parties.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/