- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25239 WP No. 17545 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 17545 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: PRATHIKA PALM SPRINGS GARDENS, 4TH CROSS LEFT, ALFA GARDENS, KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD, AYYAPPANAGAR, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 036. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT UMPATHY KONUGURU, KARNATAKA SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT 1960. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAGONDAPPA SUBHASHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF COMMISSIONER BBMP, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 002. 2. ZONAL COMMISSIONER, HOODI SUB-DIVISION, BBMP, BANGALORE - 560 048. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HOODI SUB DIVISION, BBMP, BANGALORE - 560 048. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HOODI SUB DIVISION, Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25239 WP No. 17545 of 2025 BBMP, BANGALORE - 560 048. 5. POLICE INSPECTOR K.R.PURA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE - 560 036. 6. BESCOM E-7, K.R.PURA SUB-DIVISION, BESCOM DURAVANINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 036, ALSO AT K.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 7. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD (BWSSB), CAUVERY BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. BOPANNA B, AGA FOR R5; SMT. ANUSHA PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED. 23-02-2025 VIDE ORDER NO. BBMP/VA.A/MA.VA/1238/2024-25 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND ORDER DATED 27-02-2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-F VIDE ORDER NO.EY.E.E(E)/E7/EY.E(THA)/2024- 25/2/92 AND ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25239 WP No. 17545 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The petitioner is assailing the confirmation order passed by respondent No.2/Zonal Commissioner vide Annexure-E under 248(3) of the BBMP Act (for short, 'Act'). The order impugned is appealable under Section 253 of the Act. The petitioner has an efficacious remedy of an appeal and therefore, this Court is not inclined to exercise its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail a remedy of an appeal, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK CT: BHK