Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74342 (KAR)

BABY NARAYANA SALVANKAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9316/2024 · 2025-11-06

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44855 WP No. 9316 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9316 OF 2024 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. BABY NARAYANA SALVANKAR D/O NARAYANA SALVANKAR, W/O PANDURANGA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.1-49, ALEVOOR KODI, MOODU ALEVOOR, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-574 118 REP BY ITS GPA HOLDER, ASHRAFF MOHAMMED BABU, S/O LATE M.S.M. BABU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT ICON FLAT NO.207, 1ST FLOOR, BEHIND NEW CITY HOSPITAL, AJJARKAD WARD, UDUPI-576 101 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.S. PARIKSHITH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44855 WP No. 9316 of 2024 2. THE CHAIRMAN LAND TRIBUNAL, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-574 118 3. SRI. CHANDRAHASA SALVANKAR S/O LATE VAMANA SALVANKAR, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT SHIVAGIRI HOUSE, ALEVOOR-MANIPAL ROAD, NEAR DUGLI POST, ALEVOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-574 118 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03.08.2022 IN CASE NO. LRY-85-261-TRI-9085/1979-80 VIDE ANNEXURE B IN SO FOR AS THE IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN SY. NO. 8/2 MEASURING 1 ACRE 59 CENTS OF ALEVOOR VIILAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND GRANT CONFIRM THE OCCUPANCY RIGHT IN SY. NO. 8/2 MEASURING 1 ACRE 59 CENTS OF ALEVOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44855 WP No. 9316 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as hereunder: "In view of out of court settlement between the petitioner and respondent No.3, the above petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity." In light of the memo filed, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP