Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24237 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Ankit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant-Smt. Renu Beriwal, on bail in Case Crime No. 319 of 2024, under Sections 103 (1), 61 (2) (A), 191 (3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Govind Nagar, District-Kanpur Nagar, during pendency of the trial. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused applicant is innocent. She has been falsely implicated in the present case and is languishing in jail since 21.09.2024. He further submits a First Information Report was lodged by one Muskan, with the allegation that on 20.09.2024 all the 5 named accused persons severely beaten the brother of the first informant, namely Sahil, with Lathi, Danda and iron rod, due to which his brother sustained several injuries and during treatment he died. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the First Information Report. First informant in her statement under Section 181 BNSS has not taken the name of the applicant. Name of the applicant has been surfaced in the second statement of the first informant. Eye witnesses of the incident has taken the name of the applicant with the allegation that she was standing near the place of incident and except this no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. Criminal history of two cases has been properly explained in paragraph no. 24 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application and there is no likelihood of her fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Renu Beriwal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Smt. Renu Beriwal, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless her personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel her bail. September 10, 2025 Deepak/ BAIL No. 24237 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad