Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7434 (JHR)

ANIL DAS ALIAS ANIL KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1891/2025 · 2025-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17416] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1891 of 2025 ------ Anil Das @ Anil Kumar Das, aged about 25 years, S/O- Puran Das @ Paran Das, R/O Village- Dumartar, P.O. + P.S.- Karon, District- Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 I.A. No.7865 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application. Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands rejected being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.1891 of 2025 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.140 of 2024 registered under Section 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 C of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and two mobile phones and two SIM Cards have been recovered from his possession and he has defrauded the victim Takari Fahim Khan to the tune of Rs.2,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the amount allegedly defrauded to the bank account of the aforesaid victim without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.12.2024 as is evident from para-22 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.2,000/- in the account of victim Takari Fahim Khan without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.140 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/