Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114375 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7089 of 2025 Petitioner :- Brijendra Pratap Singh Respondent :- Sanjay Kuma Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Ojha,Sumit Kumar Pathak Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant petition has been filed for following relief:
"(A) Issue an order or direction in suitable nature directing learned court i.e. Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to decide the 6-C application dated 22.03.2023 pending in Case No. 1027 of 2022 (Brijendra Versus Sanjay) expeditiously, preferably within a specific time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, if, possible on the next date of hearing."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad