Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7431 (JK)

FEHMEEDA AKHTER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)

WP(C)/1199/2025 · 2025-05-26

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 07 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1199/2025 CM(3172/2025) Fehmeeda Akhter …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Fayaz Ahmad Lone, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nadiya Abdullah, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Mohsin S. Qadri, Sr. AAG. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 26.05.2025 01. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied in case the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage by directing the respondent No. 2- Additional Deputy Commissioner, Awantipora, to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner on 9th May, 2025 (Annexure-VII to the writ petition), for seeking permission for construction of commercial complex, Kadlabal. 02. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Nadiya Abdullah, learned Assisting Counsel appearing vice Mr. Mohsin S. Qadri, learned Senior Additional Advocate General has caused appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the present petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, she submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field. 03. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the material on record. 04. Without issuing formal notice in the instant case, the same is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties at its threshold and is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondent No. 2-Additional Deputy Commissioner, Awantipora, to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner on 9th May, 2025 (Annexure-VII to the writ petition), for seeking permission for construction of commercial complex Kadlabal, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law, within a period of six weeks, from the date a copy of this Order along with copy of writ petition as also the annexures appended with the writ petition, are made available to the said respondent. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 2, be provided to the petitioner through registered post. 05. Writ petition disposed of along with connected CM in the manner as indicated above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 26.05.2025 “HAMID”