Sr. No.42 Suppl. List II IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR LPA 111/2025 In WP(C) 892/2025 Caveat 1129/2025 ARUN SHARMA AND ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) Through: - Mr. Saqib Shabir, Advocate with Ms Nainza Khan, Advocate Vs. RAKESH SHARMA CHOUDHARY AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) Through:- Mr. Parimoksh Seth, Sr. Advocate for R-1. Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG for R-2 to 7. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 21.05.2025 Caveat No. 1129/2025:- With the appearance of Mr. Parimoksh Seth, learned senior counsel, caveat stands discharged. LPA No. 111/2025:- Notice. Notice waived by Mr. Parimoksh Seth, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 1. Similarly, by Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG for the respondents 2 to 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we were inclined to stay the impugned interim order, however, Mr. Parimoksh Seth, learned senior counsel appearing for the MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.05.25 respondent No. 1, submitted that the writ Court may be allowed to decide the matter on the date already fixed and till the matter is considered by the writ Court, the interim order passed by the writ Court may be stayed. In view of the aforesaid, this appeal is disposed of by providing that till the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 1 is considered and disposed of by the writ Court, there shall be stay of the impugned order passed by the writ Court. Disposed of. (SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE Srinagar, 21.05.2025 “Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.05.25