Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74299 (MAD)

SARAVANAN RAMASAMY v. The Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl./420/2025 · 2025-07-28

P Velmurugan

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(Crl)No.420 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.07.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.(Crl).No.420 of 2025 Saravanan Ramasamy ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District. 3. Praveen Kumar 4. Naveen Kumar ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to forward the representation given by the petitioner on 30.05.2025 to the second respondent herein and to dispose of the representation within the stipulated time to be prescribed by this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl)No.420 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.C.V.Kumar For Respondents : Dr.C.E.Pratap, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for RR1 and 2 ****** ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking directions to the first respondent to forward the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2025 to the second respondent and to dispose of the same within the stipulated time. 2 It is seen that the petitioner sought directions to the first respondent to forward his representation to the first respondent and dispose of the same. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent 1 and 2 submitted that the petitioner's representation has already been forwarded to the second respondent and summons also issued to the petitioner to appear before the second respondent on 30.07.2025 for enquiry. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl)No.420 of 2025 3 In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents 1 and 2, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy in the manner known to law. 28.07.2025 cgi Speaking /Non-speaking order Copy to: 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl)No.420 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J. cgi W.P.(Crl.)No.420 of 2025 28.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis