Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74280 (KAR)

V PUTTASWAMY v. SRI DHANANJAYA RAM ENJETI

RFA/900/2019 · 2025-08-28

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33312 RFA No. 900 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.900 OF 2019 (RES) BETWEEN: V. PUTTASWAMY S/O LATE SVARADARAJSETTY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, # 664, III MAIN, 14TH CROSS, BHEL EXTENSTION, PATTANAGETRE, RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA, BENGALURU – 560 098. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. AJAY T., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI DHANANJAYA RAM ENJETI S/O LATE SURYA PRASAD ENJETI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, BRINDAVANA II B CROSS, KATHRIGUPPE MAIN ROAD, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 085, REPTD BY HIS GPA HOLDER, SRI. GANGADHARA RAO SUBBIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARUN BHAT., ADVOCATE) THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.01.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.7508/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT. Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33312 RFA No. 900 of 2019 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Smt. Aruna Bhat, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri. Arun Bhat, learned counsel for the respondent, both have submitted that the appellant has vacated the suit schedule premises and handed over possession to the respondent on 19.12.2020. 2. It is submitted that now the appellant is not in occupation of the suit schedule premises. When this being the fact, the appeal has become infructuous as the decree is completely met with. Except regarding the claim and counterclaim of arrears of rent, the parties shall workout their remedy as per law. 3. With these observations, now the appeal has become infructuous. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29