RAVIKIRAN v. THE COMMISSIONER FOR EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION
WP/25598/2025 · 2025-08-22
K Surender
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74273 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74273 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 25598 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-08-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 25598 of 2025 Ravikiran Petitioner Vs
1. The Commissioner For Employees Compensation, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.
2. The Joint Commissioner Of Labour-II for Employees Compensation, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. Respondent(s) PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to trace the case bundle, fix an early date for hearing and pass orders regarding the rightful compensation amount payable to the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.F.Terry Chella Raja For Respondent(s): M.Jayanthy AGP For R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25598 of 2025 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking direction to the respondent to trace the case bundle, and fix an early date for hearing and pass orders regarding the rightful compensation amount payable to the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing on either side are present.
3. The petitioner has filed a claim petition under the Employee's Compensation Act, before the second respondent in E.C.No.246 of 2016, seeking compensation and it is reported that the case is at the stage of final hearing. At that stage, the case bundle was misplaced in the office of the second respondent/ The Joint Commissioner of Labour-II, for the Employee's Compensation, Chennai. Hence, the petitioner has preferred this Writ Petition with the above said prayer.
4. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that in the event of being any directions passed by this Court, the second respondent would stick to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25598 of 2025 the said direction and dispose of the case within a stipulated time frame.
5. Heard both sides and perused the records.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the second respondent to dispose of the case within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
K. SURENDER, J. 22-08-2025 Jai Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25598 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner For Employees Compensation DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai- 600 006. 2.The Joint Commissioner Of Labour-II For Employees Compensation, DMS Compound Teynampet, Chennai- 600 006. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25598 of 2025 K.SURENDER J. jai WP No. 25598 of 2025
22-08-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis