233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35384-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 23.07.2025 INDRAJ SUTHAR ALIAS INDRAJ .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. ….. SUMEET GOEL , J (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has, very fairly, submitted that the present petition has been mistakenly mentioned as the first bail petition. The said error occurred due to lack of instructions, as she is a legal aid counsel and the petitioner is in custody. The explanation put forth by the learned counsel is accepted, and this aspect of the matter is closed. Notion of motion. On the strength of advance notice; Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Learned State counsel, on instructions, has submitted that all prosecution witnesses stand examined, and the case is now fixed for 24.07.2025 for defence evidence/arguments. JATIN 2025.07.23 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-35384-2025 -2- This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve into the rival contentions in detail so as to adjudicate upon the present petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed. Keeping in view the entirety of facts, the trial Court is directed to make an earnest endeavour for expeditious disposal of the trial. (SUMEET GOEL) 23.07.2025 JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2025.07.23 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document