IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Mansirat Kaur and another Yashpal, SCO No.42 CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.4.2025 Court in CW through her natural guardian mother) and another vs. Union of India and another” the petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the respondent ‘Annexure C’. She further submits that in case the petitioners supply ‘Annexure C’, their case will be dealt with, in accordance with law.” submits that since the passports have been issued to the petitioners, COCP-3204-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3204 of 2025 Date of decision : Mansirat Kaur and another Versus Yashpal, Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, SCO No.42-51, Pocket-1, Near Bus Stand, Jalandhar, Punjab CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Shubham Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Amrita Singh, Advocate for the respondent NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.4.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-11493-2025 titled as “Mansirat Kaur (being minor through her natural guardian mother) and another vs. Union of India and another” the petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the pondent-UOI to the effect that “….petitioners have not supplied ‘Annexure C’. She further submits that in case the petitioners supply ‘Annexure C’, their case will be dealt with, in accordance with law.” At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the passports have been issued to the petitioners, 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3204 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-15.09.2025 …..Petitioners Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, 1, Near Bus Stand, Jalandhar, Punjab …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Shubham Mehta, Advocate Advocate for the respondent-UOI. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Mansirat Kaur (being minor through her natural guardian mother) and another vs. Union of India and another” the petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the “….petitioners have not supplied ‘Annexure C’. She further submits that in case the petitioners supply ‘Annexure C’, their case will be dealt with, in accordance with law.” At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the passports have been issued to the petitioners, VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.17 09.09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the present contempt petition has been rendered infructous and the same may be disposed of as such. by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petition is disposed of September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3204-2025 (O & M) the present contempt petition has been rendered infructous and the same may be disposed of as such. In view of the above noted f by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 the present contempt petition has been rendered infructous and the In view of the above noted facts and submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petition is Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.17 09.09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document