Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74231 (PNJ)

CHARHAT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/34752/2025 · 2025-07-07

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34752-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 07.07.2025 CHARHAT SINGH AND ANOTHER .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. CM Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent No.2 to 5 not to harass and humiliate the petitioners by calling them to police station time and again at the instance of respondent No.6 who is daughter in law of petitioner No.1 and sister in law of petitioner No.2 who is an accused in case FIR No.83 dated 22.05.2024 U/S 306/34 of the IPC P.S. Lambi District Sri Muktsar Sahib (Annexure P-1) for forcing her husband Lovepreet Sigh son of petitioner No.1 and brother of petitioner No.2 to commit suicide and respondent No.6 has been enlarged on regular bail by the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 26.05.2025 in CRM-M No.28044 of 2025 (Annexure P-2) and Anuradha 2025.07.09 05:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34752-2025 (O&M) 2 thereafter, the respondent No.6 approached the respondent No.4 & 5 and got issued notice to the petitioners (Annexure P-3) dated 05.06.2025 on some application filed by the respondent No.6 and acting upon the instructions of the respondent No.6, the respondent No.4 & 5 are pressurizing the petitioners to enter into compromise with respondent No.6 in the above mentioned criminal case and to return her dowry articles otherwise the respondent No.4 & 5 threatened the petitioners that they will lodge false criminal case against the petitioners, therefore, the life & liberty of the petitioners is in danger at the hands of respondent No.4 & 5 who are regularly calling the petitioners on mobile phone also to the same effect. Today learned State Counsel has produced a copy of report dated 07.07.2025 stating that the instant matter has been sent to DLSA Centre, Fatehbad for mediation but the petitioners are not appearing there despite being given notices to them. A copy of that report has been provided to learned counsel for the petitioners. He after perusing the same, submits that he does not wish to press the present petition at this stage. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 07.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.09 05:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document