IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Prem Chand State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner, dated 14.06.2025 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without c the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to on the representation dated by passing a speaking order and after affordin concerned, preferably within one order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. July 07, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18313- Date of Decision : …Petitioner Versus Haryana and others …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Derabassi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner, Kurukshetra-respondent No.3 to take a decision on the .2025 (Annexure P-22), submitted by the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without c the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to on the representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P by passing a speaking order and after affordin oncerned, preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Page 1 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.07.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Advocate, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy to take a decision on the representation the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision (Annexure P-22), submitted by the petitioner by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE of 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be Deputy representation Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection ommenting on the merits of the case, to take a decision the petitioner, g opportunity of hearing to all month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the would be at VANDANA 2025.07.09 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document