1 2025:CGHC:11861 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 161 of 2025 1 - M/s Dilip Shrivastava Through Its Proprietor Dilip Shrivastava, S/o Late N.P. Shrivastava, Aged About 44 Years, Having Its Registered Office At Ward No. 44, Kabir Ward Darripara, Ambikapur, Manipur, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (Note- In The Order Dated 30-7-2024 Passed In Wpc, The Name Of The Petitioner Has Been Wrongly Typed Out As Dilip As Shrivastava And The Age Of The Petitioner Has Also Wrongly Been Typed Out As 456 Years) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Amit Katariya Ias Secretary Government Of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Cg) 2 - Shri U.S. Paikra Director Medical Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Cg) 3 - Dr. Anil Shukla Joint Director (Health), Ambikapur, District Surguja (Cg) --- Respondent(s) CONT No. 173 of 2025 1 - Maruti Traders And Suppliers Through Its Proprietor Rajendra Singh Baghel S/o Satyanarayan Singh Baghel, Agde About 46 Years, Having SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.03.12 12:16:54 +0530 2 Its Registered Office At Bsnl Office Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Shri Amit Katatriya Ias, Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Shri U.S. Paikra, Director Medical Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Dr. Anil Shukla, Joint Director (Health), Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri H.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate assisted by Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Vivek Sharma, Addl. AG for the State. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 10/03/2025 The present petitions have been filed alleging the non- compliance of the order dated 30.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P. (C). No. 3813/2024 whereby the the representations of the petitioners filed before the respondent No.1 & 2 on 23.09.2024 and before the respondent No.3 on 24.09.2024 have not been decided. 2. Learned counsel for the State/respondent submits that the order of this Court has been complied with and he has filed the relevant documents to this effect. 3 3. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of with liberty to assail the order of the respondent. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge