THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SMT. ROOPAVATHI
MFA/3050/2023 · 2025-12-13
Lok Adalath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74197 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74197 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
&
SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER
M.F.A.No.3050/2023 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.8839/2025) BETWEEN:
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (KSRTC) MYSURU RURAL DIVISION MYSURU CENTRAL DEPOT BANNIMANTAPA MYSURU REPRESENTED BY C.L.O. BANGALORE
NOTICE SENDING ADDRESS THE DIVISIONL CONTROLLER K.S.R.T.C MYSURU RURAL DIVISION MYSURU CENTRAL DEPOT BANNIMANTAPA MYSURU
...APPELLANT (BY SRI.G.LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
2 AND
1 . SMT. ROOPAVATHI W/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
2 . KAVYA N., D/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
3. SAHANA N., D/O LTE NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT #09, 18TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN JAYANAGAR MYSURU
PREVIOUS ADDRESS NO.44, 19TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN JAYANAGAR MYSURU
4. JAYAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS KYTHANAHALLI VILLAGE B.G.PURA HOBLI MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT
….RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.GIREESH S.N., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.01.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.518/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AS A PRESIDING OFFICER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS
3 CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MYSURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.30,00,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED:
CONCILIATION ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant – KSRTC along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the respondents/claimants (being authorized by the respondents/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the appellant-KSRTC and its authorized officer is filed. The respondents-claimants have agreed to receive and the appellant-KSRTC has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs only), instead of amount what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3.
The appellant-KSRTC has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award,
4 failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the claims tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- MEMBER TS