Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74194 (ALL)

YUGUL KISHOR v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9700/2025 · 2025-07-15

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114998 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9700 of 2025 Petitioner :- Yugul Kishor Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Sen Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Rajeev Sen, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Mr. Umesh Chandra Kesharwani, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "1. Issue a writ order, direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the application dated 26.06.2025 for transfer made by the petitioner through on line option No.1 Block-School Manikpur-P.S. Manikpur. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to make the transfer and adjustment properly according to the deficit and surplus Head teachers of Primary Schools and Assistant Teacher in Higher Basic Primary Schools according to the Government Order. 3. To issue some suitable order, this may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the present case. 4. To award the cost of petition to the petitioner." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has made representation before the respondent no.2, but no decision has been taken till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within a time bound period. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and in case a fresh representation is given before the respondent no.2, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- Secretary Basic Shiksha Parishad, Prayagraj, U.P., raising all his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order if there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad