FATEH BAHADUR v. NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
AO/207/2023 · 2025-06-19
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7419 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7419 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:5163 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
AO No.207 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for appellant.
2. Mr. Mohd. Shafy, learned counsel respondent No.1-Insurance Company.
3. None present for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
4. The present appeal from order is filed along with a delay condonation application (IA/1/2023).
5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has got no instructions in the matter.
6. In view of the above, delay condonation application (IA/1/2023) is rejected for want of prosecution.
7. Accordingly, the present appeal from order stands dismissed.
8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
19.06.2025 PN
PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f 0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D 84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.06.20 10:26:41 +05'30'