Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7418 (UTT)

BIJENDRA SINGH GUSAIN v. MAHADEV PARASAD NAUTIYAL

WPMS/1590/2025 · 2025-06-12

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4882 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1590/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Karmanya Pande, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that due to subsequent development, the writ petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as, the decretal amount, deposited by the petitioner before the Executing Court, was released before passing of the interim order. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 12.06.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB 0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.06.12 03:03:11 -07'00' 2025:UHC:4882