JOY KUMAR DAS v. THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. (APDCL) AND 7 ORS.
WP(C)/976/2019 · 2025-03-02
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7418 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7418 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010029442019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/976/2019 JOY KUMAR DAS S/O SRI PRABIN KUMAR DAS, R/O- VILLAGE KATHIATALI BORHOLA, P.O.
KATHIATOLI, P.S.- KAMPUR, DIST.- NAGAON (ASSAM). PIN- 782427. VERSUS THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. (APDCL) AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN, BIJULI BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781001, ASSAM.
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (MD) APDCL BIJULI BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001 ASSAM.
3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRA) APDCL BIJULI BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001 ASSAM.
4:THE GENERAL MANAGER KANCH ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL DIPHU ASSAM PIN- 782460.
Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER KANCH ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL DIPHU ASSAM PIN- 782460.
6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KANCH ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL DIPHU ASSAM PIN- 782460.
7:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DIPHU ELECTRICAL DIVISION APDCL CAR DIPHU ASSAM PIN- 782460.
8:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER LUMDING ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION APDCL LUMDING ASSAM PIN- 782447 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N K KALITA, MR. R TALUKDAR,MR D DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 03.03.2025 Heard Shri NK Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, APDCL. The matter pertains to seeking a direction for allowing the petitioner to
Page No.# 3/3 appear in the written test which was scheduled on 17.02.2019 and there was an interim order passed on 13.02.2019 directing such permission. Shri Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vide the interim order as the substantial relief having been granted, there may not be any live cause of action for adjudication. Shri Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the said submission and added that the recruitment process is long over. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition is closed as there is no live cause of action. JUDGE Comparing Assistant