Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74178 (KAR)

SMT. GITHA JAIN v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION

WP/23323/2025 · 2025-08-29

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33597 WP No. 23323 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 23323 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. GITHA JAIN W/O SRI KUSHAL KUMAR JAIN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT - NO 1-73 RATHAN HOUSE, 52ND CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560010, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS 8TH FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560009. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DIVISION, REGISTRATION OF STAMPS FOR UNDER VALUATION ENQUIRY DEPT., 8TH FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560009. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33597 WP No. 23323 of 2025 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRATION OFFICER, RAJAJI NAGARA DISTRICT, NO.3, LEELA ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, BDA COMPLEX, 2ND STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560 072. 4. THE SUB-REGISTRAR LAGGERE, NO. 13, ANANDAPPA BUILDING, LAGGERE MAIN ROAD, NEAR PARVATHINAGAR BUS STAND, BANGALORE-560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKHAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING FOR DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT FOR CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL DATED 8.01.2020 ANNX-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33597 WP No. 23323 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioner seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of her appeal under Section 45-A[3] of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The petitioner who has filed the afore appeal calling in question the Order dated 28.07.2014, and this order calls upon the petitioner to pay deficit stamp duty as also registration fee. Sri Raghavendra K, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt Navya Shekhar, a learned Additional Government Advocate, who is called upon to accept notice for the respondents, are heard for final disposal. The dispute about the payment of stamp duty is pending over a decade and this Court is of the view that writ must be issued to the respondents for expeditious disposal by a reasoned order but with due opportunity to the petitioner. Hence the following: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33597 WP No. 23323 of 2025 ORDER [a] The petition is allowed, and a writ of mandamus is issued to the second respondent to expedite the disposal of the petitioner's appeal after ensuring due opportunity. [b] The petitioner is reserved with liberty to file a certified copy of this order with the second respondent within four [4] weeks and the second respondent shall ensure that the appeal is disposed of, as aforesaid with due opportunity, within an outer limit of six [6] months. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-