Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7415 (JHR)

Sitaram Snehi And Ors v. The State Of Jharkhand And Ors

WPC/4006/2016 · 2025-07-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:20545] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.4006 of 2016 ------ 1. Sitaram Snehi, son of Late Bhola Mahto 2. Mahadeo Ram, son of Late Gopal Mahto 3. Bhuneshwar Sao, son of Late Jeevlal Sao All residents of Village- Rola, P.O.- Rola, P.S.- Sadar (Mufassil), District- Hazaribagh 4. Abdul Latif, son of Late Akbar Mian, resident of Village- Amnari, P.O.- Silwar, P.S.- Sadar (Mufassil), District- Hazaribagh 5. Babulal Ram, son of Late Karam Mahto 6. Indradeo Prasad, son of Late Moti Mahto Both petitioner No. 5 and 6 are resident of Village- Silwar, P.O.- Silwar, P.S.- Sadar (Mufassil), District- Hazaribagh .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. & District- Hazaribagh 3. The Circle Officer, Sadar Circle, Hazaribagh, P.S.- Sadar, P.O. & District- Hazaribagh 4. Tafsul Hussain, son of Late Ramjan Mian, resident of Village- Amnari, P.O.- Silwar, P.S.- Sadar (Mufassil), District- Hazaribagh .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ravi Kerketta, SC VI Mr. Pankaj Kr. Ravi, Advocate ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-25-07-2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the prayer made in the instant Writ Petition has become infructuous, hence, the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/