SANJAY YADAV ALIAS SANJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1659/2025 · 2025-03-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7413 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7413 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1659 of 2025
------ Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar, aged about 17 years, s/o Tejo Mahto, r/o Village-Alagdeshi, P.O.-Dhanwar, P.S.-Dhanwar, P.O.-Gorthamba, Dist.-Giridih
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Anup P. Topno, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 17.03.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No.177 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2)/ 191(3)/ 190/ 115(2)/ 118(1)/ 117(2)/ 118(2)/109/74/76/352/351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of unlawful assembly; in prosecution of the common object of the assembly committed rioting armed with deadly weapons. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is a child in conflict with law; aged 17 years. It is then submitted that there was a free fight between the parties and for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioner, Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024 has been lodged by the uncle of the petitioner, namely Munshi Mahto. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No.177 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-