MOHAMMAD RAMZAN MALIK AND ORS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/1127/2025 · 2025-05-19
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7411 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7411 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 02 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1127/2025 CM(2982/2025) Mohammad Ramzan Malik & Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Y. Lone, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others.
...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nadiya Abdullah, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Mohsin S. Qadri, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 19.05.2025
01. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would feel satisfied, if the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage by directing the respondent No. 3-Collector, Land Acquisition (PDD), Bemina, Srinagar, to decide the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioners before him, within some reasonable timeframe.
02. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Nadiya Abdullah, learned Assisting Counsel appearing vice Mr. Mohsin S. Qadri, learned Senior Additional Advocate General has caused appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the present petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, she submits that the representation of the petitioners would
be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field.
03. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the material on record.
04. Without issuing formal notice in the instant case, the same is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the
learned counsel for the parties at its threshold and is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondent No. 3-Collector, Land Acquisition (PDD), Bemina, Srinagar, to accord consideration to the representation (Annexure-III to the writ petition) alleged to have been filed by the petitioners before him, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law, within a period of six weeks, from the date a copy of this Order along with copy of writ petition as also the annexures appended with the writ petition, are made available to the said respondent. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 3, be provided to the petitioners through registered post.
05. Writ petition disposed of along with connected CM in the manner as indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge SRINAGAR: 19.05.2025
“HAMID”