Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7411 (AP)

Bommidi Nancharamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5035/2020 · 2025-09-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010074272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5035/2020 Between: BOMMIDI NANCHARAMMA, W/O. NANCHARAIAH HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, DOOR NO 25-26/1,GOKAMAMATAM VILLAGE,NIZAMPATNAM MANDALAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT,AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECREATARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI,AP 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR,AP 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT,AP 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NIZAMPATNAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT,AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus directing the Official Respondents to conduct investigation with Special Investigation Team or with CBCID or with any other any efficient Investigating agency with regard to the homicide death of Bommidig Gopi,S/o Nancharaih registered as Cr.No 2/2018 dated 03-01-2018 as man Missing case and to consider the representation dated 08-02-2018 submitted to the Honourable home Minister by the petitioner to register case against the culprits named in Representation.” 2 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, after completion of investigation in Crime No.2 of 2018 on the file of the Nizampatnam Police Station, the Police referred the same as ‘Un Detectable’. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri P.Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5035 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh