Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74097 (ALL)

MEENU VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

NA529/2194/2025 · 2025-07-15

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114724 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2194 of 2025 Applicant :- Meenu Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rishu Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case No.7759 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No.56 of 2021 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District Maharajganj pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Fast Track Court-I, Maharajganj expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is aggrieved wife/ informant of the aforesaid case. The case is pending at the stage of framing of charge and the accused persons are applying delaying tactics and till date charges have not been framed in the matter. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that opposite party no.2/ husband was not appearing before the trial Court and on 22.8.2024 his case was separated from other accused persons, however, the rest of the accused persons also not cooperating with the trial Court as a result of which even charges have not been framed so far. The accused persons are applying delaying tactics in the matter. The trial court is expected to take strict action against the accused persons, who are trying to delay the trial of this case and even charges have not been framed on account of their delaying tactics. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to pass an order on the point of framing of charge in this case as per law within two month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad