Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74093 (KAR)

M/S MAHISHMARDINI GRIHA NIRMAN PVT LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13128/2023 · 2025-10-09

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39767 WP NO.13128 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13128 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S MAHISHMARDINI GRIHA NIRMAN PVT. LTD. HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: 4TH FLOOR, SALARPURIA WINDSOR, NO.3, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042. REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. ASHWIN SANCHETI, S/O MANOHARCHAND SANCHETI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPUR, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39767 WP NO.13128 OF 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AJND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE SALE CERTIFICATE DATED 10TH OCTOBER, 2008 WHICH WAS REGISTERED ON 20TH JANUARY, 2009 IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUB-REGISTRAR, NELAMANGALA AS DOCUMENT NO.NMG-RULE 17(3)-0001-2008-09 STORED IN CD NO.NMGD 120 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT THE ALTERNATIVE LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 15 GUNTAS VIDE ANNEXURE-A; THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition with a liberty to approach the competent Authority by making appropriate representation. 2. The said submission is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority by making appropriate representation. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11