- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47080 WP No. 9548 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 9548 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI MUNIRAJU S/O LATE BACHAPPA AGED 35 YEARS RESIDENT OF KOLAVANAHLLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAVISHANKAR T.P, ADV.) AND: 1. SRI V. NAGARAJU S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA AGED 66 YEARS RESIDENT OF KOLAVANAHLLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 103. 2. MUNIVENKATAPPA S/O NANJUNDAPPA DIED, REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS. 3. SMT. AKKAYAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 4. SRI KEMPANNA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47080 WP No. 9548 of 2020 5. SRI NANJUNDAPPA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 6. SRI VENKATESH S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 7. SRI MUNE GOWDA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 8. SMT. ANANDAMMA D/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. 9. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 10. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 11. SRI MANJUNATHA S/O LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 11 ARE RESIDENT OF KOLAVANAHLLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SATHYA D, ADV., FOR SRI K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADV., FOR R-1; V/O/DTD 02.09.2020, NOTICE TO R-2 TO R-11 ARE D/W) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTILCES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.06.2020 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT CHICKBALLAPUR, IN R.A.NO.135/2017, ON INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47080 WP No. 9548 of 2020 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Counsel for respondent no.1 has filed a memo stating that R.A.No.135/2017 (New No.49/2023), out of which, this writ petition arises, has been disposed of on 14.11.2025. Along with the said memo, the case status report is also filed. 2. Memo is taken on record. Writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, with liberty to the petitioner's Counsel to file necessary application, if necessary. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48